In my endeavor to discover the mystery of Big Foot, I have found tree breaks in spots where you are not expecting in conjunction to natural causes.  I have found these tree breaks in specific locations that are linked to Big Foot activity.  Tree damage by wind, man-made or damage by known animals such as deer, mountain lion or bear have certain similarities when you find them.  All of them have distinct signs including Big Foot.   

 

Out in the field, all of my finds were found in the forest, by a water source and in/next to a ravine.  How do you explain this?  This is a pattern that is consistent.  I have been able to go into a new area and apply this pattern.  So far Big Foot activity have been found.  The signs are there for a supposedly non-existent species.  How do you explain this?  I am a skeptic at heart but I am not stupid.   If I can find and apply certain patterns to find something, it tells me that there is something out there.  I know there is a bipedal primate in our woods and forest.

 

So far I have talked about the history of sightings, primate behavior and now consistent patterns of  signs of Big Foot.  There is enough here to warrant an official scientific search. 

 

A primate has just been discovered in the forest of Africa.  The local people have always known and talked about it.  Just because it has been officially discovered recently doesn't mean it wasn't there before the discovery.  It was there the whole time!