Sunday, August 18, 2013


There have been people who will say that there is no possible way that we could have a bipedal primate because the environment cannot support one much less a group of them.  Most people who use this argument have not done their research into the environment of our woods and forest here in North America or primate behaviors.  We have enough space and an eco-system varied enough to support them.  They are opportunistic eaters.  In other words if it is edible they will eat it.  Much like a bear. 

The Native Americans and early settlers have lived off the land.  It is possible to do this.  What our forest friends have to their advantage is the possession of cunning human smart intelligence.  Another big advantage any primate has is the ability to adapt to the conditions of their environment.  If supplies are low then they will go where there is food sources.  Rural communities have for many years reported seeing them.  Garbage cans, dumps, pet food left on porches, gardens and domesticated livestock are all available.  Using stealth and keeping to the shadows is their specialty.  Their biggest advantage is not being "real".  They are in a survival mode of existence.  They will do what they need to do in order to survive.

I like it when so called experts will throw out what they call valid reasons of why there isn't a bipedal primate here in North America.  This so-called valid reason of the environment not able to support them is not so valid once you look at the facts.

I am debunking one reason at a time.  Too bad our science community will not take the time to actually look at the mystery of Big Foot.  Even to try to scientifically debunking it would be more professional than throwing out ridiculous reasons of why there is no Big Foot.       

Saturday, August 3, 2013


Aside from my faith in God as a Christian and my family, I have 2 great passions in my life.  One is the welfare of children and the mystery of Big Foot.  Now you must be wondering why these two passions and if there is a reason.

I feel strongly that all children are our future.  We have a moral obligation to protect and nurture them to the best of our abilities.  Our society has not done what is best for all our children and it should be a priority.  It is time for us to stand up and be their voice.

"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." ~Martin Luther King, Jr

A wise and smart man.  Too bad his life was taken before his time.  His voice was what our country needed to hear whether we wanted to hear it or not.  Hate and bigotry is a waste of time, emotions and efforts.  It is much better to spend our time on good things such as tolerance of the differences in our culture. 

The reason I bring this up is because I feel we are on the edge of officially discovering Big Foot.  There are many in the field that are diligently trying to bring about this discovery.  I have mixed emotions about this.  The main reason I have the mixed emotions is by looking back at how our society has handled big discoveries or big events.  Our track record is downright horrible.  Our society is more into the sensational and the big news than anything else.  What could happen to this shy, elusive bipedal primate scares me.

I have done my research and have found enough evidence to convince me that there is a bipedal primate here in North America.  I have no doubt.  Would I share certain evidence such as a real good photo of one or a video is a real dilemma.   My love of discovery has been surpassed by my feelings of protectiveness towards this species.  I will cross that hurdle when it happens. 

I challenge anyone who has an open mind to go research this fascinating mystery.  Just reading the sightings reported by ordinary folks like you or me will make you want to read more.  Looking at the evidence collected by groups out there will make you think.  Reading the stories from Native Americans and First Nations People will grab your attention.

Go ahead and expand your world to the possibilities.

Yes, there is a bipedal primate out there that is 8 feet tall and hairy.  Probably peeking at you while you are picnicking or camping.  The rustle in the bushes at a local state or federal park may have one coming in for a closer look.  Just remember that I told you about them.  Try not to scream when you see one. 



Saturday, July 20, 2013


If you have done any Big Foot research or have read eye witness accounts, you may have heard about eyes glowing.  The Native Americans have made references and also people in the 1800 and 1900's have stated about seeing glowing eyes.  This is one of those references that seem unbelievable.  It seems to be unnatural to us.  In the past posts I have stated that if it happens in nature somewhere then it is possible.  We have examples of fish, eels and insects generating electricity to glow or to zap.  They have evolved and adapted to use electricity that all living things make as energy.  To say it is impossible for a primate to do this is not for us to make assumptions about.  Our world has time and time again has proven our assumptions wrong.  Instead of dismissing this assumption our science community should be looking into this possibility even to prove it wrong.

The reason I bring this up again is to discuss what I have witnessed several times while out investigating Big Foot.  As a person who values tangible proof and evidence this is one area that I have to use eye witness accounts including myself.  I have no tangible evidence such as a photo for what I have personally witnessed.  Whether you choose to believe is up to you.  I am secure in what I have seen to believe that it is possible.  Let me go into detail of what I have seen.  This happened at the same location at 4 different times.  It is in a National Forest where people do not live.  Hours away from any major city and over 25 miles from any town.  It is remote and a wilderness area.

The first time was in March.  It had snowed a couple of days before we went there.  The only tracks were our cars going into that location.  We were around the campfire one night.  I kept seeing a set of glowing lights close to the ground.  They would flicker from red to white.  They reminded me of twinkling stars or LED lights only close to the ground.  One of the investigators walked over there.  They went bright red and then white.  At one point I saw 3 separate set of lights.  Then they were gone.  When you walked over to where I saw them it was just the forest.  No cars or houses.  We were the only ones in there.  ??

The second time was the first week in June.  We had some family friends visit and wanted to go.  We went to a known spot where eye shine has been seen.  Again I saw twinkling lights that would go from red to white.  Sometimes when one of the investigators talked they would go bright and then back to the twinkling shine.  We saw this to the right of us, in front and to our left.  ???

The third time was at the end of June on Summer Solstice.  We went down to the known area again.  Almost immediately we saw eye shine.  We also saw a glow that resembles what you would see from cities from a distance at night only there is no city there, it was much closer, it was in the forest and not on the horizon.  At one point the other investigator said there was eye shine right behind me, big and about 4 feet above me.  I am only 5'4"!  I had heard something behind me and I also had seen big eye shine a few minutes before in front of me.  It had moved behind me and was close!  On this night I had seen what I would call amazing eye shine.  The eye shine was so bright that I saw the outline of the head and shoulders.  This eye shine was moving!  This happened 3-4 times.  When spoken to, the eye shine would get even bigger, sometimes change colors and then go back.  I could tell when they moved their heads.  I would see 2, then one and then 2 again.  ????

The fourth time was just over a week ago.  My husband wanted to go.  We went down to the known area again.  We saw eye shine but it was more like what was seen in March and the first part of June.  We saw up to 3 sets of eye shine but it was not the amazing bright eye shine seen 3 weeks before.  Still it was something to see.  ????? 

Before you dismiss what I have witnessed, let me tell you that I have walked over to where the eye shine had been seen to check.  It was just the forest.  No campsites or people or houses anywhere.  I am the type of person who wants real evidence.  Made up, imagined or false facts is not what I am about.  To prove the existence of this amazing bipedal primate, I will only present real facts and what I have truly witnessed.  Nothing else.  I don't have time for anything else.  And in the end it doesn't help and would hurt my research.

So I hope I have given you something to think about.  My research through found physical evidence such as prints, hair and tree structures and also what I have witnessed have pointed to a bipedal primate living here in the woods and forest of Colorado.  


  

Friday, July 5, 2013

Similar Big Foot evidence found hundreds of mile apart in Colorado.

This blog was designed to have you think outside the box, question the science community and to look at the real evidence that is waiting for you to ponder about the mystery of Big Foot.  As a person who loves to solve puzzles and research mysteries I hope I have compelled you to do this.  I like to look at all the facts and let the facts speak for themselves.  There are 3 things that jumped out to me when I started my research into the mystery of Big Foot.  One-They are in every state except Hawaii.  Two-there are some real compelling evidence from credible witnesses.  Three-The similarities of certain information in the sightings and reports that spans hundreds of years.  Starting with the Native Americans through modern times.

Through my research and my own physical searching I have drawn the conclusion that there are bipedal primates living in the woods and forest of North America.  I know they are there.  How they have been able to elude our mainstream society for hundreds of years cannot be explained by me.  The only answer I have is that they are related to both great apes and human and that may be the key.  They are human smart and have evolved to remain out of sight of our human world.  Only a lucky few have had the privilege to have some type of interaction with this elusive primate.

In the month of June I have had the distinct privilege to experience finding similar evidence in 2 different locations hundreds of miles apart.  As the person who collected this evidence I know where they were found and saw both pieces of evidence with my eyes.  There was no chance this was mistaken identity or a fabrication.

At the beginning of June, I was out investigating with some others when some black hair was found.  It was collected by me.  I measured and took pictures of it.  There is no doubt it is hair and not fur. 



At the end of June while looking at a known Big Foot resting spot, I found a black hair.  This location is hundreds of miles apart from the other location.


What are the odds of finding similar evidence in a forest setting hundreds of miles apart?  Since I know the circumstances of both locations I know it was extreme luck that this happened.  I should have bought a lottery ticket.

Both hairs have taper ends.  You can see that the ends have never been cut like you would see in human hair.  Bear fur is much shorter and thicker.  I cannot think of another living being in the forest who would have hair and is black.

Let the evidence speak for itself.  This is one of those compelling pieces that has helped to convince me about Big Foot. 

I KNOW THEY ARE REAL AND LIVING IN OUR WOODS AND FORESTS.
 
 

Monday, June 17, 2013




 According to Wikipedia, "The Yeti may be considered a sort of parallel myth to the Big Foot of North America."

I have a problem with Wikipedia's conclusion about the Yeti and Big Foot.  Instead of researching and examining the evidence, they have done what any institution that is in the business to teach should not do.  They had only examined one aspect of a subject or used someone else's analysis without researching and drew an erroneous conclusion.  If they have done what I did then their conclusion would be a lot different.

Both the indigenous people of the Himalayan region, Native Americans of the United States and the First Nations of Canada have rich oral history of this bipedal primate.  It is part of their culture, history and mythology.  In certain regions of the indigenous people of both continents there are distinct differences in their perception of the bipedal primate.  In North America the further west you go it is seen as more a flesh and blood being.  In the eastern part of North America they are seen more as a sign and mythical being.  In the Himalayan bipedal primate the more south you go the more mythical being versus the northern area where they are seen as a being with more human characterizations.  All of them regard them as a living being and part of their world.  The myth part may be explained as an explanation of what they did not know.  Like their legends explaining how certain things happen and why.  It is not wrong but a way for them to understand their world and how they and others live in it.

In the 1800's the indigenous people of central Africa talked about the "Bush Man".  The descriptions, oral history and stories almost parallel the Yeti in Asia and Big Foot in North America.  If history has taught us anything it has taught us that it will repeat itself again and again.  Why are we still doing this?  In the 1920's the gorilla was finally discovered by our world.  Of course it was already discovered and known by the locals.  The so-called experts refused to listen to the natives saying that it was fear and superstition. 

We have oral history ourselves in regards to the bipedal primate.  The sightings and reports made to certain Big Foot organizations continue to be recorded.  In the 1800's a pioneer wrote in his journal about coming across huge bare foot prints in the dead of winter.  In 1951 while attempting to scale Mount Everest, Eric Shipley took photographs of a number of large prints in the snow.  I personally have found a 16, 17 and 19 inch prints.  The list can go on. 

Why do the so-called experts and our society jump to the conclusion that the Yeti and Big Foot is a myth?  Or that it is the superstitions and fears of uneducated or simple folks?  My conclusion to that question is that our science community and society feel it is too bizarre to be actually true.  Anything that bizarre can't be true.  I have heard and read many experts say that simple people or the uneducated have vivid imaginations and let their superstitions color what they saw or heard.  Of course the experts have all the answers to our world, nature and science.  The first mistake any educated person with this mindset is narrowing our world to predictable conclusions.  If anything our world and the surrounding universe is a wonderful mysterious place just waiting for more exploration.  Science answers the questions of our world but is not the absolute answer to our world.  The day we draw absolute conclusions about nature and science is just asking for Pandora's Box to be opened.  When the pictures and writings about the platypus was sent to England it was dismissed as a hoax.  Sound familiar?  They had to send an actual specimen there to prove their existence.  The experts were so sure it had been sewn together that they dissect it to prove it was a hoax.

I know there are people out there that are perpetuating Big Foot hoaxes.  You can't dismiss all for a few.  If you look at what has been collected and reported you will find a certain pattern of similarities that should not be evident in hoaxes, superstitions and fears.  It is that pattern that had me look closer. 

Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature.  And that is because in the final analysis, we ourselves are a part of the mystery that we are trying to solve.   -Max Planck  

Saturday, June 8, 2013

 
It has been reported by people for many years that Big Foot eyes glow or light up at night.  Even some of the Native Americans have made reference to this.  If this so-called non-exist species is not real why is there documented stories and oral history on this specific phenomena? 
 
Many people feel that this phenomena of glowing or lit-up eyes seen at night is too fantastic to be real.  My contention is if it happens in nature somewhere else then it is possible.  We have fish that glow in the deep ocean.  How do you explain that?  We have eels that shock.  We do have examples of other living things doing this phenomena.  It just seems too fantastic because we are saying a primate is able to do this and not a fish.  It does not say anywhere in nature that only fish are able to do this.  Evolving and adaptations are done with all species for specific reasons.  Big Foot having eyes that light up to see in the dark would make sense for adaptation to hunt in woods and forests.
 
Instead of automatically dismissing many of the things that are related to Big Foot, people need to actually look at what has been gathered about this amazing bipedal primate.  There is more good information and evidence on this primate than most people realize.

Tuesday, June 4, 2013


My question to you:

"If there is no such thing as a Big Foot.  Why am I able to go into areas using data obtained over many years that points to the presence of them and find physical evidence?"

I had some family friends come in this week and wanted to go squatching.  With other investigators we went into an area that has been visited many times for the last 5 years.  While there we ventured into a new area and experienced many things that points to their presence.

If they are not real we would not be finding evidence such as a foot print or hair.  How do you explain this?  If my imagination is seeing what I want to see then the prints, structures and other physical signs should not be found.  I have seen and heard many things that I can't prove and many would say I think I saw/heard it.  But when you combine both the physical and what I have seem/heard it is hard to point to it being my imagination.

I am a skeptic at heart.  The reason I started to look for the evidence of Big Foot is because I wanted to see the evidence first hand and not from other people.  I know what I have collected/seen/heard and experienced.  With this and what others have investigated have convinced me that there is a bipedal primate in our woods and forest.  There is not another explanation that would answer what I have investigated other than a Big Foot.

Many may believe but I know that Big Foot does reside in our woods and forest in North America.  Whether you believe what I know doesn't matter because I have the evidence that proves it.