There have been people who will say that there is no possible way that we could have a bipedal primate because the environment cannot support one much less a group of them.  Most people who use this argument have not done their research into the environment of our woods and forest here in North America or primate behaviors.  We have enough space and an eco-system varied enough to support them.  They are opportunistic eaters.  In other words if it is edible they will eat it.  Much like a bear. 

The Native Americans and early settlers have lived off the land.  It is possible to do this.  What our forest friends have to their advantage is the possession of cunning human smart intelligence.  Another big advantage any primate has is the ability to adapt to the conditions of their environment.  If supplies are low then they will go where there is food sources.  Rural communities have for many years reported seeing them.  Garbage cans, dumps, pet food left on porches, gardens and domesticated livestock are all available.  Using stealth and keeping to the shadows is their specialty.  Their biggest advantage is not being "real".  They are in a survival mode of existence.  They will do what they need to do in order to survive.

I like it when so called experts will throw out what they call valid reasons of why there isn't a bipedal primate here in North America.  This so-called valid reason of the environment not able to support them is not so valid once you look at the facts.

I am debunking one reason at a time.  Too bad our science community will not take the time to actually look at the mystery of Big Foot.  Even to try to scientifically debunking it would be more professional than throwing out ridiculous reasons of why there is no Big Foot.