In my last post, I challenged people to do some research on the subject.  I have read books that ridicule believers of a bipedal primate in our woods and forests here in America and Canada.  Most who do this have not done any research on the subject.  They have rejected the idea out of hand because of some famous hoaxes that happened in the past.  My questions to this:

• If you use this as your reason to why there are no bipedal primates, what is the proof of hoaxers involved?  Most do it for publicity.  The sheer number of people involved would be huge.
• Where are they? 
• Proof of what they used?  Pictures? 
• Where?  Does it correspond with all the sightings made?

There have been hoaxers and it will continue.  That is why you must examine what is presented with an open mind but with a skeptic heart.  Does that makes sense?  In other words, you need to listen, think is this plausible and examine what is actually presented.  Most hoaxes are fairly easy to spot.  Thank goodness.

My next challenge to you.  Why allow uninformed people make what you believe about the possibility of a bipedal primate here in North America?  Circumstantial evidence here in our country convicts criminals.  Sometimes that is all you have until new technology and research can help. 

I have talked with a family who had interactions with a family of bipedal primates for 5 years.  One family member saw one only once in that time.  There is no doubt with this family about Big Foot.  You would be surprised at the demographics of this family.  This is not some illiterate, superstitious people but an educated white collar family.