Bigfoot presence in Colorado

 

 

 

At every location where I investigate I have found prints or impressions.  Huge prints, large prints, some in the human size scale and a couple that were very small.  Many by a water source but some where the Colorado soil wasn't too hard and I was lucky to find the print and in the forest litter.  How have I been successful in finding prints?  The answer is quite simple:

 

I use the signs they leave that point to their presence

and look where would they most likely travel.

 

 

All things that live in the forest leaves a sign of their presence.  It is up to a person looking to learn what the signs are that are left by that particular species.  This approach is used by many who are looking in the forest for a certain species.  Hunters, guides, rangers and biologists all use these signs to help them pinpoint where to look when searching for a species they want to track, hunt or see.  This also applies to looking for the bipedal primate we call Bigfoot/Sasquatch.  They do leave signs of their presence.  Sometimes apparent or sometimes subtle.  It is a process of trial and error to figure out the "what and where" you need to look.  Using reports of sightings are a good resource to help point you to a certain location but it should not be the only resource used.  What about areas where there are no reports?  Does that mean they are not in there?  Reports need to be recognized for what they are.  A person had some type of possible Bigfoot experience and had reported it.  It does not mean that unless there is a report then they are not in a given location.  What it means is that someone was lucky enough to experience this and had reported it.  It is a good way to point you to a certain area.  Nothing more, nothing less.  You need to use several resources to be able to successfully find an active Bigfoot location.  This includes the demographics of the environment and recognizing the signs they leave in the woods and forest.  If you go into an area that has trees and expect they are in there without looking for the physical signs then the chances of them there is next to nothing. 

 

This is a shy, wary, elusive and intelligent primate that can problem solve.  There is nothing easy about finding locations they are in and using.  Take the example of deer or elk and how hard they are to hunt.  They are not even a primate.  When you recognize how it is not a simple matter of just finding some trees and forest and you will find them is a major step forward to helping a person in their endeavor.  If this was an easy process then they would have been officially found a long time ago.

 

So if these signs of their presence are not real or imagined then how do you explain the prints and impressions I have found using recognizable signs to find the locations?  Finding one or two or even five may be considered lucky but I have found much more than that at several locations including different states.  Some as big as 19 inches and in remote locations.  These prints are the physical evidence and validation of me using the signs of their presence in a location.  I am not talking about 1 or 2 locations but 5 locations.

 

Its not a coincident.       

 

 



 

 

 

With this blog I have tried to use sound thinking and reasoning that is backed up with some of the physical evidence that I have collected to make my case about the real presence of Bigfoot here in North America.  Specifically here in Colorado.  I do want to state that I have no doubt of them being real and living in the woods and forest.  So my perspective comes from my knowledge and not based on belief of their existence.  There is a difference.  This knowledge will influence how I talk and argue about them being a real and living species.  So keep this in mind because I have gone from trying to prove their existence to wanting to learn more about them.  That is a major factor in my thought process in regards to this elusive bipedal primate.  What they are exactly and how they fall into the primate category is still a big question.  At this point I know they are alive and living at least here in Colorado but I strongly suspect they live elsewhere in North America.

I will be honest and tell you that I have seen them several times over 1 1/2 years.  I have no photographs or videos to back this up.  Just an eye witness account.  I have been lucky and being in the right place has been a major reason for my visuals.  There are times I have gone back and reviewed  my sightings.  Making sure they were not a figment of my imagination or miss identification.  Why would I do this?  I do this to make sure I am being honest with myself and my fellow SIR investigators.  When I do this it helps me keep a perspective on what I have seen and experienced.  These reviews have cemented my knowledge and helped me while gathering evidence out in the field.  What did I see?

1. I saw upright hair covered primates.  The upright stance seemed natural and comfortable.  No bobbing or staggering.  Some of them had long hair on their heads and around their shoulders.  One was a female-I could tell from looking that it had the characteristics of a female.
2. There was movements with most of my sightings:  Moving back and forth from one foot to the other, bending down, turning to look in another direction, moving it's head, leaning away from the tree, walking away and moving back into the tree cover. 
3. Different coloring and on one the face was lighter than the rest of it. 
4. The faces were a face of a primate.  They look similar but were different.
5. They were very big.  In fact a couple of my visuals were huge.  Outside the range of normal people.

Did I surprise you with the details?  It shouldn't.  These visuals were real and I saw them.  One visual I had I was thinking I was looking at a woman with long hair until I realized that it was covered all over with brown hair.  ????  While watching her, I visually marked where her head was by the pine and when she left I went over there and measured where her head was.  7 feet tall!  When you look at what I had seen, there would be no doubt it was not a bear or mountain lion or deer or elk or another person.  Not a figment of my imagination.  It is what it is-Sasquatch. 

 

It makes you think.  

 

 

As I ponder about the new year, it makes me look back at what was in the past.  The more I explore into the mystery of Bigfoot to try to make sense of this bipedal primate, the more questions I have.

The first thing I would like to point out are the stories that fishermen and sailors have told about a giant squid.  There have been illustrations about this monster that were drawn and painted by people hundreds and maybe even a thousand years ago.  This was done in different parts of the world.  The fishermen off the Baja California coast had been talking about them for hundreds of years.  The science community has always scoffed at these tales as wild stories of an ocean monster.  Well, guess what?  These so called superstitious locals were right.  There are giant squid in the ocean.  I imagine they are in other parts of the world in other oceans.  Why?  Because there are stories about them there too.

So my questions I have been pondering now for several weeks are the stories told in the medieval and the dark ages about monsters.  Two that come to mind are dragons and hairy giants.  What do I make of this in light of what I have learn over the past 3 years?  Never say never.

So my questions are:

What if the hairy monsters depicted in ancient times were hominids such as a Sasquatch-type of species?

Could they have been all over the world and not just in North America or Asia?

Could they still be in the areas where the stories and pictures have been created?

What if they are real and not just superstitious stories?

What about dragons?

Why would they have detail descriptions of dragons on several continents?

Have similar descriptions of dragons in ancient times?  Before mass communication?

I ask these questions because you should never discount local stories and their shared common knowledge that is passed down through the generations.  To have similar descriptions and stories from different continents from ancient times which correspond to similar stories and descriptions in North America and Asia.   This should make us want to delve into the mysteries more and not to discount them.  Not to laugh or dismiss it as superstition.  Never say never.

So could these fantastic stories I have learned and read may be based on a real species?

NEVER SAY NEVER because our science community and experts have been discounting locals and regular folks for over a thousand years.  They have been proven wrong again and again.  It seems to me that being a so called expert may put blinders on many.  Having an enquiring and an open mind should be a hallmark for science since this field was founded on the premise of trying to answer the mystery of our planet.  I am not saying that being educated and science-oriented is a negative.  What I am saying is that our world is full of mystery and you need to have an open mind to the possibilities that are still hidden.

Never say never...

Tree structure made by Bigfoot in Colorado.

I have in the past have stated that I felt that Bigfoot does use trees for their personal purposes.  Why would they do this?  The main reason I feel they do this is to communicate with each other effectively over large tracts of land without too much effort.  It makes perfect sense for an intelligent primate to communicate in this manner.

Last weekend, I went out into the field with another researcher.  He had found this beautiful tree structure.  You can tell by the pictures that this was purposely made.  There was no way wind or snow had done this.  The structure was not made to be used as a shelter.  What was the purpose of this structure?  This is a perfect example of how our forest friends will use trees to communicate.  What was communicated?  I am uncertain of what was being said but not knowing the end result of this structure does not minimize or take away from the fact that this was purposely made by an intelligent being.

I have found similar structures in other locations hundreds of miles apart.  With similar arches, ravines/terrain and tree break structures close by there seems to be a purpose to it.   That points to it being some kind of message.  I have also noticed that the tree breaks by certain structures have a certain type of breakage.  The height, type of break and distance of the tree breaks are also part of the communication with the main structure found. 

Just by figuring out that this is some type of communication is a break through for me.  I am now figuring out the details to see if I can figure out what was communicated.  Looking at the ground and above the ground is very important when you come across tree structures.  I am hoping that the similarities and details will give me more hints of what was communicated.

This bipedal primate is very intelligent and resourceful.  Never underestimate them.  They are not like a deer or bear.  They are a primate much like us and then not like us.  I think by being respectful and unpredictable I will garner their interests and curiosity.  I feel very strongly that it will be the personal approach and not the high tech gear that will draw them.

So I will continue to go out in the field looking for more structures.  By documenting and comparing similarities between different locations will help in this endeavor.   Hopefully the "what" of these structures will be answered in the near future.

Why the persistent stories of Bigfoot?

Why has there been persistent stories of an elusive bipedal primate here in North America?

There has been persistent stories through many different types of sources about a walking, hairy Bigfoot something here in North America for more than 400 years.  The idea of this being perpetuated by uneducated and superstitious folks is actually more of a myth than anything else in regard to the Bigfoot phenomena.  About a third of the reports come from rangers, policemen, firemen, biologists, scientists, teachers and other educated people.  The details of many of these reports refute the idea of a vague or mystical being seen.  

These persistent similarities are consistent throughout the 400 plus years all over North America.  Which when you factor in the perceived perception that this is a west coast region phenomena, is pretty amazing.  Regardless of this perception, the reality garnered from the reports and stories actually point to a wide spread North American phenomena.  That reality is what surprises most people.

Sometimes it is the little details reported that make a major impact on re-enforces the reality that there is a bipedal primate in the woods and forests of North America.  One small detail that points to their reality is one seen swaying from one foot to the other while standing and watching.  This small detail of movement seen may not seem to mean much but it is one more detail seen and noted by many.   Another small detail reported by many is the lack of neck seen.  This small detail has been consistently reported by many.

The main reason we will continue to get persistent stories of the elusive bipedal primate because in reality it is a living, breathing species living in our woods and forest here in North America.  That is why we will continue to get stories of Bigfoot regardless of the perception of our society and the science community. 

"People from different backgrounds and different parts of the world have describe very similar creatures, behaviors in similar ways, and uttering some striking similar sounds.  As far as I am concerned, the existence of hominids of this sort is a very real probability."

~Renowned chimpanzee expert Jane Goodall talking on National Radio~

"Given the scientific evidence that I have examined, I'm convinced there's a creature out there that is yet to be identified."

~Dr. Jeff Meldrum, Idaho State University Professor of Anatomy and Anthropology~

My question to you:

Why would these two well known experts say what they did about Sasquatch if they were not sure of what they know or suspect?

There are compelling evidence of Sasquatch existence.  The crux of the matter with many is the lack of a body.  Where is the body?  We don't have one at this time.

Is that the only reason to dismiss the probability of a primate here in North America?

My thought: why are we so worried about the lack of a body?  Do we need to have a body to "prove" their existence?  What of the other evidence that has been collected over the years?  

The history of discovering new species is having a body.  That way it can be examined and dissected by scientists all they want.  The one thing that researchers such as Jane Goodall have shown that the best knowledge to learn about a species is through field work.  It is much more enlightening through field work than killing and dissecting a species.  That is where in many cases educated guesses from dissections that had become knowledge but found to be wrong by field work.  Species are living and breathing beings.  Knowing how many ribs or teeth is good to know but the behavior and life style observed of species is a better way to gather information.

So until we have a body which I hope is through natural causes, we should gather the field research of this elusive species.  Why worry about something we don't have control over?  By observing and learning about this species through first hand knowledge may be the best way for them.  By knowing who they are in a respectful way and having the general knowledge of them as a species may be how we can as humans able to learn about them without harming them.

To me using any means for the end result of discovery is not ethical or right.  Justification of killing one for the whole species does not make it right.  It is not for the one killed.  What if our science community wanted to kill you saying that it will help our society?  It is always easier for the one who is not in harms way to try to justify this.

We do have a species of some type of hominid here in North America.  I suspect also in other parts of the world.  I dare you to go discover them.  They are out there. 

Do you think that Bigfoot uses trees for structures?

That my friends is an important question that all who go out in the field to investigate the mystery of Bigfoot should ask themselves.  This I feel is a valid and important question.  From what I can see there are two camps about this question.  One is that they do not use trees for structures or signs.  That what is seen is a natural occurrence.  The other is that yes, Bigfoot does use trees for structures and signs.  

I had gone to a Bigfoot meeting to hear a person talk about what types of evidence we have in regard to Bigfoot.  At one point one woman had asked him if he looked for tree breaks or structures.  He had replied that he doesn't because he doesn't know what they mean.  I was surprised and then wasn't too surprised by his answer.  I know of many who says that there are too many natural factors that causes tree breaks and what looks like tree structures.  What I was surprised about was his answer that he doesn't because he doesn't understand them so he ignores them.  That my friends is very compelling to me.  He never said that they don't make them.  He just said he doesn't understand them so he doesn't look at them.

I am telling you that there are many natural factors that causes tree breaks and structures.  It does occur.  In fact all of them are except in an area that is being used by our forest friends.  In an area that they use, a tiny percentage of less than 1% I would say could be Bigfoot related.  Almost all that I see in the forest is natural occurrences.  It is that one or two unusual tree structures or breaks that doesn't make sense.  I literally will see hundreds while out exploring and if I am lucky I will find 1 sometimes 2 tree related Bigfoot structures.

Four main reasons on why they use trees for structures and signs:

• The most readily available resource in the forest is trees.
• They are primates that are human smart.
• Primates use many different types of communication.
• Primates are adaptable and will use the environment to their advantage.  

The following reasons I have found while out in the field that leads to the conclusion they use trees:

• My sightings of this primate have been in areas that have tree breaks and structures.
• The tree breaks show certain indications that are not wind or animal related.  These break patterns are consistent even hundreds of miles apart.
• Structures that don't make sense if it was caused by natural occurrences.  Similar structures found hundreds of miles apart.
• I have followed tree  breaks that lead to several shelters that I believe were made by them to use.  They were found in steep and hard to find places.  No cut marks by tools on the branches and trees used.  They were woven together using no tools or rope or other material other than branches and trees.
• I have found certain patterns that I feel that are Bigfoot related in regards to tree breaks and structures.  When I see a certain type of tree break that seemed to be in a pattern, I will find certain tree structures close by.  This is consistent in areas hundreds of miles apart.
• I have found prints in the areas that have tree breaks and structures.
• One location where prints where found and had eye shine on two separate camping excursions was found by seeing one key tree break.  It made me stop and explore the area.

I have several locations that I go out and investigate.  I have had success of finding physical evidence of them such as prints.  At 4 of these locations I have seen them.  Clear visuals of them.   No shadows or a miss-identification.  All of these locations were found using tree breaks and structures.  I have no doubt that they use the trees for their own uses.  The intriguing part is trying to figure out the why.