Hide-n-Seek Champion-The Sasquatch

I have in the past blogs have talked about how it is possible for our bipedal primate to be able to successfully hide from our society.  I would like to talk a bit more on how it is possible even in modern times.  There are many who feel our modern times are so "modern" with our technology that there is no more mystery.  We have all the answers.  That in itself tells me that our modern times have more in common with the dark ages of the past. 

Why?

I feel that with this mindset it has closed our minds to learning and the possibilities of anything and everything.  Which sounds a bit like the mindset of the dark ages.  The only difference I can see is the fear factor but it may also play a factor in our modern time along with arrogance.  The reality is that we do not have all the answers and never will.  It is all about opinions and science's educated guesses.  Our earth and the living beings living on the blue planet will always be mysterious.  That includes us.  We still don't know how and what with life beginning and when it ends.  How will we be able to find the answers to the mystery when we are part of it?

With that said I would like to talk about how it is possible for a large bipedal primate to live successively here in North America right under our noses.  I will point out that they have been known for hundreds of years by Native Americans and others but since they are only people and not the science community their insight and knowledge has been disregarded as myth or superstition.

How is that possible?

I suspect that this primate is intelligent and savvy in regards to human behavior and have adapted accordingly.  Why not promote the idea of being a figment of someone imagination and hide in plain sight?  I am thinking some of the urban legends and haunted stories of certain forest/woods/ravines could be linked to Bigfoot.  Many of the sounds and sightings sound a lot like some of these legends and stories.  How about the wildman or woman who everyone says is a hermit but no one has never seen but heard about?  Sound familiar?

How about moving around mostly during the night time?  Shadows?  Weird sounds?  Unexplained happenings?  Animals behaving weirdly?  Stories have been passed down through families who live by swamps/woods/forest.  These stories have enough details that point to an unknown wild species here in America.  If these wildlife savvy people know how to track and hunt to survive, how can you dismiss the stories and their knowledge?  How do you explain how Native Americans knew how to react/deal with one and how to avoid it? 

When you stop and look at some of what people have shared over the years many of the details are compelling enough to point to something big, hairy and walking on 2 legs here in North America.  Many have shared the small details that even seems more compelling to me.  Most stories may seemed to be based on fear or imagination will not have the details or descriptions unless it is based on something real and seen and experienced.  When you have similar details that need to be seen in person and shared before modern times and could not shared like it would today speaks volumes to me.  Its all about the details.

Now I would like to point out how it is possible for them to hide even in modern times with all our technology.  Just the point of them using forested, wooded, rugged terrain makes it possible.  Our technology still has problems with our woods/forest and rugged areas.  Even our outlying areas of our urban locations are possible for them.  We have many parks and designated wild areas for them to successfully remain hidden from us when needed.  Then we have our remote wilderness areas.  Just the sheer size and inaccessibility make it a perfect place for them. 

Their ability to hide is not perfect.  How do I know this?  Because we have continual sightings of them on a consistent basis.  The system works but its not failsafe.  The main reason they are successful is our continual premise that they are a myth and not real.  So even if seen it is dismissed as misidentification or an illusion. 

How perfect is that for an intelligent primate to live successfully just out of reach of our society?



   

We live in a world that is mysterious and ever changing.  There have been many times that our science community has made definite statements about living beings and how our earth functioned.  Then they had to revised their findings because they were not correct.  One perfect example that illustrates this is when I was growing up I was taught that life cannot happen without light.  Then the exploration of our deep oceans had our science community restate that in order for life to happen you need energy.  I will add that this statement should only be apply to our earth.  Expecting this to be true on other planets is a bit short-sided and arrogant is my thought.  How can we be expert on something we know nothing about?

I have never thought of how the stories that we were taught or told from long ago may have some truth to them.  I have been taught that they were superstition-based stories from people who did not know anything.  They had a wild imagination and were not real.  Now older and wiser I am wondering who is being closed-minded and short-sided?  I am thinking our educated and profound experts have missed the opportunity to learn more about our world.  Similar and persistent stories from ancient times through modern time have been found throughout our world.  Not just here in North America.  Could those stories about knights of old from the medieval times fighting monsters and unknown beast be based on fact?  How about the stories about sea creatures?  One such sea monster the giant squid turned out to be true.

Now we are hearing about mounds with giants with double row of teeth with 6 fingers found here in America.  How about in South America those skulls with elongated skulls?  What else has there been found but hidden from us since it does not fit our perceptions of our history and the living creatures?

When you look at the new primates found recently within the last 5 years, it makes it easier to think of the possibility of a North American bipedal primate.  The remoteness and wild areas here in North America is still here.  When you add an intelligent bipedal primate it makes it a real possibility.  The primate species other than humans on our continent is missing that is found elsewhere.  We have the climate and right environment.  Where are they?

I have gone from being someone who is trying to discover Bigfoot to actually knowing they are real and alive here in North America.  I am secure in what I have found and seen.  What frustrates me is the way our experts refuse to even look into this primate.  Just because it has been sensationalized and yes, even hoaxed by stupid people should not hinder them from dispelling this persistent mystery.  This is a perfect opportunity to prove once and for all that this mystery is just people's imagination.

The main reason I think they won't do this is because they don't want to be proven wrong.  Our woods and forest will never be the same when they are officially discovered.  It may open a can of worms. 

How Do You Explain the Prints?

I had gone to a friend's location that has active Bigfoot activity.  What was nice about this location was it being void of people and rained all night until 4:30 in the morning.  The 19 inch print with track way was found at night in the rain.  It was gone the next morning because of the rain.  That was a lucky find.  I am glad we took pictures right then and did not wait for the morning.  We also found where this 19 inch one walked along the tree line.  We also found 9 1/2 inch prints.  All washed away in the rain by the next morning. 

Saturday morning we had explored the location and found several more prints.

How do you explain the prints found Saturday morning?  They could not have been made on Friday because of the rain.  The ones found Friday night were washed away.

This is a perfect example of how rain actually played a positive factor for me this weekend.  It gave me a time frame of when the prints were made and eliminated other possibilities.

Yes, there is a bipedal primate out there in our woods and forest.  There is no doubt.  This rainy weekend was a clear indication that points to this.

If Bigfoot is so Shy and Elusive, Why are they seen?

Why are Bigfoot seen by people?  They are reported to be shy and elusive.  Would this be a reason not to believe people?

This would make for a solid reason if we lived in a perfect world and people do not visit or live in areas that may have some Bigfoot.  Statistically there will be some type of report about them if they are real.  In other words the reports and physicals evidence such as prints are statistics augmenting their existence.  All living things on earth leave some type of signs of their existence.  This also applies to Bigfoot being a bipedal primate living in the woods and forests of North America.  We have ongoing indications of them now for over 400 years and they keep coming.  Even in our modern world.    You cannot disclaim reliable and reputable eye witness accounts.  What about the physical prints found that are outside the human size range or in cold climates where bare feet is a detriment to survival? 

Why would a primate that has been reputed to be shy, elusive and wary of people be seen by people?

That actually is easy to answer.  They are curious and territorial.  They are primates and show primate behavior.  In other words they will come look because something about the person or their actions has triggered their curiosity or they don't want the person in that location.  Sometimes a hunter or person is in a location before a Bigfoot and will catch the Bigfoot unaware.

Does this sound like something a real primate or person would do?  Yes, it does.

So a primate that is wary and shy of people will have the curiosity to go take a look or check things out.  They will also respond to perceived infringements if they feel the need.  That is why the reports and sightings are so important.  Having people explain what they were doing and what they experienced will give further clues about this bipedal primate.  Much of the sightings have similarities but differences.  Which would be expected when you have different situations, people and bipedal primates.

Just thinking of statistics and coincidences in regards to this primate does point more to the reality of them.  Not the other way around.

So when you are walking one evening on a pathway in the woods...
that rustle or footsteps you hear may be a curious bipedal primate watching you.

  

Bigfoot presence in Colorado

 

 

 

At every location where I investigate I have found prints or impressions.  Huge prints, large prints, some in the human size scale and a couple that were very small.  Many by a water source but some where the Colorado soil wasn't too hard and I was lucky to find the print and in the forest litter.  How have I been successful in finding prints?  The answer is quite simple:

 

I use the signs they leave that point to their presence

and look where would they most likely travel.

 

 

All things that live in the forest leaves a sign of their presence.  It is up to a person looking to learn what the signs are that are left by that particular species.  This approach is used by many who are looking in the forest for a certain species.  Hunters, guides, rangers and biologists all use these signs to help them pinpoint where to look when searching for a species they want to track, hunt or see.  This also applies to looking for the bipedal primate we call Bigfoot/Sasquatch.  They do leave signs of their presence.  Sometimes apparent or sometimes subtle.  It is a process of trial and error to figure out the "what and where" you need to look.  Using reports of sightings are a good resource to help point you to a certain location but it should not be the only resource used.  What about areas where there are no reports?  Does that mean they are not in there?  Reports need to be recognized for what they are.  A person had some type of possible Bigfoot experience and had reported it.  It does not mean that unless there is a report then they are not in a given location.  What it means is that someone was lucky enough to experience this and had reported it.  It is a good way to point you to a certain area.  Nothing more, nothing less.  You need to use several resources to be able to successfully find an active Bigfoot location.  This includes the demographics of the environment and recognizing the signs they leave in the woods and forest.  If you go into an area that has trees and expect they are in there without looking for the physical signs then the chances of them there is next to nothing. 

 

This is a shy, wary, elusive and intelligent primate that can problem solve.  There is nothing easy about finding locations they are in and using.  Take the example of deer or elk and how hard they are to hunt.  They are not even a primate.  When you recognize how it is not a simple matter of just finding some trees and forest and you will find them is a major step forward to helping a person in their endeavor.  If this was an easy process then they would have been officially found a long time ago.

 

So if these signs of their presence are not real or imagined then how do you explain the prints and impressions I have found using recognizable signs to find the locations?  Finding one or two or even five may be considered lucky but I have found much more than that at several locations including different states.  Some as big as 19 inches and in remote locations.  These prints are the physical evidence and validation of me using the signs of their presence in a location.  I am not talking about 1 or 2 locations but 5 locations.

 

Its not a coincident.       

 

 



 

 

 

With this blog I have tried to use sound thinking and reasoning that is backed up with some of the physical evidence that I have collected to make my case about the real presence of Bigfoot here in North America.  Specifically here in Colorado.  I do want to state that I have no doubt of them being real and living in the woods and forest.  So my perspective comes from my knowledge and not based on belief of their existence.  There is a difference.  This knowledge will influence how I talk and argue about them being a real and living species.  So keep this in mind because I have gone from trying to prove their existence to wanting to learn more about them.  That is a major factor in my thought process in regards to this elusive bipedal primate.  What they are exactly and how they fall into the primate category is still a big question.  At this point I know they are alive and living at least here in Colorado but I strongly suspect they live elsewhere in North America.

I will be honest and tell you that I have seen them several times over 1 1/2 years.  I have no photographs or videos to back this up.  Just an eye witness account.  I have been lucky and being in the right place has been a major reason for my visuals.  There are times I have gone back and reviewed  my sightings.  Making sure they were not a figment of my imagination or miss identification.  Why would I do this?  I do this to make sure I am being honest with myself and my fellow SIR investigators.  When I do this it helps me keep a perspective on what I have seen and experienced.  These reviews have cemented my knowledge and helped me while gathering evidence out in the field.  What did I see?

1. I saw upright hair covered primates.  The upright stance seemed natural and comfortable.  No bobbing or staggering.  Some of them had long hair on their heads and around their shoulders.  One was a female-I could tell from looking that it had the characteristics of a female.
2. There was movements with most of my sightings:  Moving back and forth from one foot to the other, bending down, turning to look in another direction, moving it's head, leaning away from the tree, walking away and moving back into the tree cover. 
3. Different coloring and on one the face was lighter than the rest of it. 
4. The faces were a face of a primate.  They look similar but were different.
5. They were very big.  In fact a couple of my visuals were huge.  Outside the range of normal people.

Did I surprise you with the details?  It shouldn't.  These visuals were real and I saw them.  One visual I had I was thinking I was looking at a woman with long hair until I realized that it was covered all over with brown hair.  ????  While watching her, I visually marked where her head was by the pine and when she left I went over there and measured where her head was.  7 feet tall!  When you look at what I had seen, there would be no doubt it was not a bear or mountain lion or deer or elk or another person.  Not a figment of my imagination.  It is what it is-Sasquatch. 

 

It makes you think.  

 

 

As I ponder about the new year, it makes me look back at what was in the past.  The more I explore into the mystery of Bigfoot to try to make sense of this bipedal primate, the more questions I have.

The first thing I would like to point out are the stories that fishermen and sailors have told about a giant squid.  There have been illustrations about this monster that were drawn and painted by people hundreds and maybe even a thousand years ago.  This was done in different parts of the world.  The fishermen off the Baja California coast had been talking about them for hundreds of years.  The science community has always scoffed at these tales as wild stories of an ocean monster.  Well, guess what?  These so called superstitious locals were right.  There are giant squid in the ocean.  I imagine they are in other parts of the world in other oceans.  Why?  Because there are stories about them there too.

So my questions I have been pondering now for several weeks are the stories told in the medieval and the dark ages about monsters.  Two that come to mind are dragons and hairy giants.  What do I make of this in light of what I have learn over the past 3 years?  Never say never.

So my questions are:

What if the hairy monsters depicted in ancient times were hominids such as a Sasquatch-type of species?

Could they have been all over the world and not just in North America or Asia?

Could they still be in the areas where the stories and pictures have been created?

What if they are real and not just superstitious stories?

What about dragons?

Why would they have detail descriptions of dragons on several continents?

Have similar descriptions of dragons in ancient times?  Before mass communication?

I ask these questions because you should never discount local stories and their shared common knowledge that is passed down through the generations.  To have similar descriptions and stories from different continents from ancient times which correspond to similar stories and descriptions in North America and Asia.   This should make us want to delve into the mysteries more and not to discount them.  Not to laugh or dismiss it as superstition.  Never say never.

So could these fantastic stories I have learned and read may be based on a real species?

NEVER SAY NEVER because our science community and experts have been discounting locals and regular folks for over a thousand years.  They have been proven wrong again and again.  It seems to me that being a so called expert may put blinders on many.  Having an enquiring and an open mind should be a hallmark for science since this field was founded on the premise of trying to answer the mystery of our planet.  I am not saying that being educated and science-oriented is a negative.  What I am saying is that our world is full of mystery and you need to have an open mind to the possibilities that are still hidden.

Never say never...