One dark, cold evening this week as I was in this tent using the facilities, I heard foot steps to the left.  They were very close. 

This is the facts:

• Remote camping spot.
• Only campers were us.  
• Everyone was at the main tent area while I was in the blue tent.
• Something on 2 feet was walking around.
• The crunch sounds of the foot steps were from walking on the pinecones and bare ground and not on the snow.
• It sounded very close.
• The steps walked quickly away when I stood up.
• Did not see or hear anything when I left the tent.

What are the possibilies of what I heard?

• Everyone was accounted for during this time.
• No possibilities of other campers.
• Heard distinct bipedaled foot steps.  No doubt or question.

I heard distinct foot steps.  There was no doubt of what I heard.  There was something that was bipedaled walking around me while I was using the facilities.  A bit unnerving but exciting. 

WHAT ELSE COULD IT BE?

 

Every living thing leaves some signs of their presence.  The 2 photos above are signs of beaver activity.  I never did see any but I know they are there by the prints and tree damage.

 

 

At another location, I took a picture of an impression of a bird swooping down and catching a small animal.  How do I know that this happened since I did not see it unfold?  The impression in the snow showed me.

 



 



 

This picture of a large tree that was pushed apart and down was found earlier in March.  It looked like it was done within the last month or two.  Where it was found and other signs found point to BigFoot.  I have been finding signs such as this along with large bare foot prints in this location now for over a year.

 

Just because I haven't seen one doesn't mean they are not there.  The signs do point to BigFoot activity and have been for quite a while.  Remember I never did see a beaver or the bird but the signs did point to their presence.  Why would this type of BigFoot evidence not be considered for further study? 

 

SOMETHING IS OUT THERE THAT IS BIG ENOUGH TO PUSH DOWN BIG TREES AND LEAVE HUGE BARE FOOT PRINTS EVEN IN WINTER TIME.

 

 

 

   

 

 

The greatest discoveries of science have always been those that forced us to rethink our beliefs about the universe and our place in it. 

~Robert L. Park, in The New York Times, 7 December 1999

 

 

I would like for you to look very carefully at the photo.  In the space between the 2 boulders there may be something.  You will see what looks like an outline of a right shoulder and leg.  What do you think about it?  Could this be our first picture of BigFoot?  I know when my husband took this picture and then reviewed it, he was very excited.  He had me look at the picture and asked me to tell him if I saw anything.  I saw the outline immediately.

 

FYI-Before this picture was taken we had heard some movements back behind our gifting rock.  My husband climbed up on a boulder and took some pictures in that direction.  We were thinking that we caught one peeking. 

 

My goal in my research is to find real evidence of BigFoot.  As a researcher I want to verify my evidence.  So the next time we were there we went to the spot and looked.  What did I find?  The spot under the boulders was much smaller than we thought.  Only about 4 feet tall.  The outline was a rock behind the 2 boulders.  At first I was disappointed but then I realized that validating my evidence is a priority.  Going back to retake pictures or search the location helps validate my findings.  It should be a priority of every researcher to go back and check your findings.

 

What if I never went back to check?  I would have a picture that is false data.  Being methodical and diligent should be part of every researcher repertoire. 

 

I now show this pictures to people when speaking to point out that not everything you take a picture of is BigFoot and that you need to go back and recheck your work.  

 

Showing shadows and blurred images does not help convince people about the existence of a bipedal primate in our woods and forest.  Validated evidence and research will.  It is time to stop promoting these types of images. 

 

 



This is a typical spot in my research area.  As you can see there are downed trees, boulders and shadows.  Why would I take this picture?  Is there something lurking in the shadows of the background?  The downed trees were caused by BigFoot?  Maybe one is peeking at me from behind the boulder in the middle of the picture?

I have a very simple explanation on why I took this picture.  The beauty of this spot caught my attention and I wanted to have a reminder of it.  As I said previously in my posts, not everything we see or experience is BigFoot related.  I have almost as many pictures of beautiful Colorado as I do that are suspected BigFoot activity.

 

This picture is not too far from the first picture.  Can you see anything in this picture that may be BigFoot related?  In the middle there is a classic tree break that is suspected to be made by a BigFoot.

When I go researching I am careful to look for clues.  I try to read what the forest is trying to show me.  Most of what I find is like the top picture.  But every once in a while I will come across what I am searching for.  The evidence of a bipedal primate who is human smart.

I have a confession to make.  I do not believe there is a bipedal primate known as BigFoot or Sasquatch in our woods and forest.  Does that surprise you?  It shouldn't if you have been reading my previous posts. 

I KNOW THERE ARE BIPEDAL PRIMATES KNOWN AS BIGFOOT OR SASQUATCH LIVING IN OUR WOODS AND FOREST.

To me the belief is just words.  When you know by the evidence you find, it makes your words turn into knowledge.  Everyone knows that knowledge is everything.  My evidence backs up my knowledge.  There is no doubt.

When you have this knowledge it is very hard to listen to people mouth their belief without any evidence.  I am not saying that belief is not good but your belief should be back up with evidence. 

So when you talk to someone like me about the existence of BigFoot you may start to think about the possibilities.  If you talk with someone with only their belief then there is a chance of changing their mind. 

Who would you rather talk to?  Someone who knows or someone who believes?